Home sweet home
Monday, April 18th, 2005Web Posted: 04/16/2005 12:00 AM CDT
Rosemary Barnes
Express-News Business Writer
If and when the housing bubble bursts, San Antonio homeowners might feel a slight quiver at the most. They’ll be buffered from any big boom by the stability of area home values and prices in recent years.
When Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan talks about those “certain areas” of the nation where he sees unstable housing price bubbles, he’s not referring to San Antonio or other Texas urban areas.
San Antonio area home values rose about 4.3 percent in 2004, while state prices averaged a 3.9 percent increase. Those are modest increases compared with the 11.2 percent average jump on the national scale.
“There’s been a limited amount of price appreciation going on in Texas compared to the nation,” said Mark Dotzour, chief economist of the Texas A&M University Real Estate Center. “There’s been no bubble in the housing markets of any city in Texas.”
High double-digit increases in states such as California, Nevada, New York and New Jersey skew the national average.
The median home price in Los Angeles, now $446,400, is up 54 percent over the past two years. In California’s Riverside and San Bernardino counties, the median price of $296,000 has increased 69 percent over the same time period.
The same house in San Antonio sold for $144,000 in 2004, a 16 percent increase from 2001, when it went for $124,200.
The national mortgage debt now stands at record levels, having risen $1 trillion last year alone, and dwarfing other types of consumer debt like credit cards.
Taking advantage of rising property values, record numbers of homeowners are turning to home equity loans as a source of ready cash.
The amount Americans owe on home equity lines of credit jumped to about $491 billion at the end of 2004, up 42 percent from a year earlier, and more than triple the amount at the end of 2000. Home equity lines are usually tied to the prime rate, which in turn moves in lockstep with the federal funds rate, which the Federal Reserve has boosted seven times since last June.
Mortgage rates are still relatively low: about 6 percent for a 30-year fixed loan, according to financing firm Freddie Mac. But that’s up almost a half a percentage point from just two months ago, and more increases are expected throughout the year.
Higher interest rates will not only raise monthly payments on millions of loans, they also could deter many homeowners from refinancing. Without that ready source of cash, there will be less money to spend on everything from clothing to appliances.
Rising rates should start to hit consumer spending in a big way by this summer, according to economists. “We definitely have to figure that once tax filing season is done and tax refunds are cashed, we do expect consumer spending will slow down in the second half of this year,” said John Silvia, chief economist for Wachovia Securities.
“I don’t see any way to fudge that (higher financing costs). You’re not getting the employment gains or wage and income gains to offset that.”
Soaring home values in some states have pushed the wealth of American households up 9 percent to a record high of $49 trillion at the end of 2004.
The Fed has estimated that home values have doubled from $8 trillion to $16 trillion since 1996, matching the growth of mortgage debt, which has doubled from $3.5 trillion to $7 trillion in the same time frame.
At the same time, mortgage debt rose as homebuyers purchased expensive houses or tapped into their growing wealth through home sales, cash-out refinancings and home-equity loans.
Housing has become the primary source of wealth for Americans. But that could all change when the real estate bubbles start bursting, dragging down house prices.
Greenspan has observed that Americans in some urban areas where home prices are outstretched may experience a reversal of wealth gains.
Consumer spending since 2000 has been fed by the “housing wealth effect” created by rising values and prices.
The housing wealth effect is significantly more powerful than the wealth effect associated with rising stock prices. That’s because housing wealth is much more broadly distributed across income levels than stock wealth and its impact on consumer spending is much more immediate.
Greenspan would like to see consumer spending out of household wealth slow down because it has dissuaded too many Americans from saving their money. His campaign to raise interest rates over the last year has been designed in large measure to cool an overheated housing market.
Now that interest rates are on the rise, many economists have predicted that the time of skyrocketing house prices is nearing an end. So far, there has been no sign of a slowdown.
Housing prices have been on the rise since the stock market bubble popped in 2000. Likewise, consumer spending has been increasing.
Escalating real estate prices and low interest rates made it ideal for homeowners to convert those higher values into ready cash by refinancing.
Nowhere is the wealth effect more evident than in California. Flush with home equity made from huge price leaps throughout the state, Californians are driving up prices on homes in Oregon, Arizona and Nevada.
Half of the private-sector jobs created in California in the last two years are connected in some way to real estate. Meanwhile, property values in the last four years have swelled $1.7 trillion, the equivalent of about 35 percent of the total personal income in the state since 2001.
This sharp increase in home equity has spurred consumer spending that, in turn, has fueled more economic growth.
“We have an economy that’s rolling along on the basis of a false sense of wealth,” said Christopher Thornberg, a senior economist with the UCLA Anderson Forecast team.
Some Californians are relocating, but in many cases they’re buying a second home, typically paying for it with cash-out refinancing or a home equity line of credit.
The prices in California are so high for the typical house that an owner can take out $200,000 from the home equity and pay cash for a house in Arizona, where prices have increased 20 percent over the last three months.
Some are buying for personal use, but many others are buying for speculation.
Some are house-rich and enthusiastic about diversifying their real estate portfolios. Others, priced out of their own communities, are leaving California in search of more affordable housing.
Few economists believe California’s house prices can continue to appreciate so rapidly. They’re predicting the prices will flatten in Southern California, with small declines in some areas of the state.
According to mortgage insurer PMI Group’s risk index of housing markets, six California metropolitan areas rank among the 10 markets most likely to see price declines over the next two years.
“There is this ‘Go East’ mentality in California,” said William Frey, a demographer with the Brookings Institution, citing U.S. Census statistics showing a net loss of domestic residents. “Even people who have lived there most of their lives, when it comes time to retire are cashing out and leaving.”
The fear is that a bursting bubble will chill California’s economic growth and jeopardize employment, which is being driven by the wealth effect.
California’s housing boom has created jobs linked directly or indirectly to housing development and sales.
“That will slow down housing construction and cause a big income shock to the economy,” Thornberg said. “And in the midst of a housing slowdown, the markets in California where housing prices and home building are strongest will be hit the hardest.”
Thornberg believes most of 2005 will continue to bring solid economic growth in California. But as housing slows, California’s economy could wobble and weaken by late 2005 or in early 2006.
“You will see construction folks not having as many houses to build and losing their jobs, you will see the mortgage bankers and loan officers losing their jobs,” Thornberg said. “Indirectly, there will be a reduction in consumer spending, which means retail sales, car sales will take a hit.”